Grupa: Użytkownik
Lokalizacja: Bydgoszcz
Posty: 321 #2482489
Od: 2015-3-2
Ilość edycji wpisu: 1 | Conclusions
• CP to CP performs worse than LP to LP by approx. 1.6dB
• CP to LP has 2dB loss
• No observed difference in spectral width between CP and LP
• CP is of course useful to overcome spatial loss in some cases
• For ultimate performance LP to LP with allowance for spatial offset is best
It is expected that stations interested in working small-dish “tropo sized”
stations will continue to use LP, preferably rotatable.
For contests and activity days CP has an advantage.
cała prezentacja
TYLKO ZAREJESTROWANI I ZALOGOWANI UŻYTKOWNICY WIDZĄ LINKI » DARMOWA REJESTRACJA
_________________
73! Andrzej |
